Execution and market connectivity
Prospective trading venues, execution providers and financial intermediaries. Outline supported instruments, client locations, quote or order access, execution records and the role your firm would perform.
We welcome discussions with prospective execution, clearing, data and technology partners around a specific institutional workflow and an agreed division of responsibility.

Prospective trading venues, execution providers and financial intermediaries. Outline supported instruments, client locations, quote or order access, execution records and the role your firm would perform.
Prospective futures commission merchants (FCMs) and related service providers. Describe account, customer-funds, clearing and reporting responsibilities, onboarding requirements and the interfaces available for a permitted introducing relationship.
Market-data and specialist information providers. Specify coverage, source definitions, timestamps, permitted commercial use, redistribution rights, retention and service support.
Providers of account interfaces, identity controls, reconciliation, monitoring, security and recovery capabilities. Describe an integration boundary, sample records and the testing or handover required.
Identify the contracting entities, intended institutional clients, applicable locations and which party performs each activity. Describe relevant permissions and the evidence available for review.
Map any instruction flow and identify who is responsible for execution, clearing, customer assets, source records and reconciliation. The proposed introducing model places customer funds with the responsible FCM.
Specify permitted uses, account authorizations, roles, sensitive-action approvals and client isolation. Agree how outages, exceptions and data corrections reach an accountable owner.
Separate company service fees from venue, clearing, data and other third-party charges. Define deliverables, acceptance evidence, support, termination and the transfer of records or connections on exit.
Document the institution, users, existing systems and one measurable workflow.
Agree the scope, data rights, responsibilities and acceptance criteria.
Map interfaces and permissions using approved access and sample records.
Test reconciliation, failure recovery and user acceptance against the agreed scope.
Deliver operating documentation, training and a defined support boundary.
A concise non-confidential brief is sufficient for an initial assessment. Technical review, partner selection and the terms of any appointment would follow separately.
Email partnerships@solirion.com with your organization, the capability you provide and the institutional workflow you would like to discuss.